mordred wrote:They were withdrawn and destroyed for the sake of mankind.
Is it that bad ?
It's not all crap if you're really into their first album, it's pretty much more of the same. But I find the songs very lacklustre, in my opinion a lame and forgetable record.
mordred wrote:They were withdrawn and destroyed for the sake of mankind.
Is it that bad ?
It's not all crap if you're really into their first album, it's pretty much more of the same. But I find the songs very lacklustre, in my opinion a lame and forgetable record.
I don't even think their first album was all that good. Not bad, but not something to champion and spend a lot of time on 20 years down the line either.
I know I ain't doing much,
doing nothing means a lot to me.
great_knuthulhu wrote:I don't even think their first album was all that good. Not bad, but not something to champion and spend a lot of time on 20 years down the line either.
Now what's this, a norwegian speaking so frankly about Artch? Don't you lusekofta-metalheads need something to be proud of as well?
No, honestly I agree with you. Another Return is a decent power metal album. It's pretty much saved by the great vocals and the two hit songs: "Another Return to Church Hill" and "Metal Life". The second album has no hits and generally weaker songs throughout, so it goes down the bin.