Yeah, it may not be enough fun. But then y'know, it's like I'm getting bored when seeing someone keeps pointing out the ugliest looking women in the street.
It’s kinda funny. In the old days when we were still poor college students, we didn’t have much money to spend on Metal stuff. There wasn’t much reference available at that time so it’s like depending on luck to find something really interesting. Most of the time we were so afraid of wasting our hard-saved money on some lame albums so usually we put our bets on those cassettes that come with great cover artworks. The result turned out to be quite rewarding though that’s not always the case I must say. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying a good album always comes with a good cover, it just that I think ‘good’ artwork is important for a Metal record. It’s perfectly ok if a person just wants to poke fun on bad covers, or if he/she wants to explore beyond the boundary, or he/she cares nothing but only music. But if a person shows great interest in a Metal record just because it has a bad cover that look somewhat special (you know what I mean)…. Well, it's still fine... but I'd say that’s not my ‘code of practice’ when come to Metal.