Page 1 of 3
Sonic Age Records
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:39 pm
by Shiremen
I just found
http://sonicagerecords.com/_shop/
As I collect CDs, this place seems like a dream come true. But then I discovered it's a Greek site. So does anyone know if all these records are bootlegs or not?
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:54 pm
by Heathen
AGONY - The First Defiance CD 13.00EUR
Thrash Metal
Later Edition
UNDER ONE FLAG RECORDS
I don't think there are any doubts...
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:08 pm
by perishinflames
Yes this is a well-known bootleg seller on ebay. They've got some legit stuff (new releases etc) but mostly bootlegs.
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:51 pm
by Shadow Kingdom
If you're in Sweden, you should support your local metal shop.
http://www.ihate.se/
They carry good stuff here and nice people to deal with.
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:00 pm
by GJ
Seconded!
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:08 pm
by ARC
Mr Kingdom speaks the truth
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:15 am
by Avenger
perishinflames wrote:Yes this is a well-known bootleg seller on ebay. They've got some legit stuff (new releases etc) but mostly bootlegs.
I'll vouch this statement.
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:47 am
by Black Axe
Even their new releases are a little iffy. They've gotten worse again after a period where they seemed to head for a more legit way of business.
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:36 pm
by heavymetalmaniac
Does someone remember "Cult Metal Classics"? I speak about the original label, which released very fine albums like "Valhalla" or "Black Knight". Their first releases were numbered and of an awesome quality, made by fans for fans.
Later on Sonic Age Records took them over and all the later releases got a very poor quality. One of the worst examples are the Brainfever CD reissues. They got the "rights" for these releases from Shark Records and pressed them from whatever sources. Especially "Capture The Night" sounds like if it was taken from an LP. I had the old Mausoleum CD pressing of this album, which sounds much better.
How happy I was when they announced the CD issue of "Cerebus - Too Late To Pray" but when I got it, it was a huge disappointment. The paper was so thin and overall it was/ is not a worthy reissue for this album. Ann Boleyn still claims that Sonic Age Records don't have the rights for this album, since Shark Records (who sold these) didn't have them either. Hoewever, I hope Ann will release this including the bonustrack and delivering a better quality - at least she wanted to do so some time ago.
I really hate this term "Later issue" and everything this way, it just means "not legit" or another word for bootleg.
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:39 pm
by perishinflames
heavymetalmaniac wrote:I really hate this term "Later issue" and everything this way, it just means "not legit" or another word for bootleg.
Yes, "fanclub release" sounds much more elegant

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:38 pm
by Shadow Kingdom
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:28 am
by heavymetalmaniac
I know you're right BUT her reissues are still better than those made by Sonic Age/ CMC.
Nothing to compare with Shadow Kingdom, Stormspell or whatsoever... but at least less painful than the greek crap -IMO.
M.
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:52 pm
by ION BRITTON
There are some Sonic Age/CMC releases that are actually well done. OK, no comparison to Stormspell or SK with those 10+ booklets and if you exclude the thin paper on almost all of them, I don't think it's fair to say that all of them suck. I mean there are lyrics, bios and bonus tracks on many of them, can't see why for example the old Slauter Xstroyes CD releases of Monster records can be considered superior to some of SA/CMC releases. Or for example the latest TYRANT CDs released thru Battle Cry records with those awful front cover prints. Surely there were some major disappointments like the BRAINFEVER CDs you mentioned, but I really can't say that they're of the lowest quality either, generally speaking.
As far as the 'bootleg or not' issue is concerned, their own releases are 99+ per cent legit. The items they sell on their webstore is a different story though as there are many bootlegs among them, usually those that are described as 'later release' which you should avoid if you are totally against bootlegs.
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:28 pm
by heavymetalmaniac
There are some Sonic Age/CMC releases that are actually well done. OK, no comparison to Stormspell or SK with those 10+ booklets and if you exclude the thin paper on almost all of them, I don't think it's fair to say that all of them suck.
You're right but there was a bunch of releases which actually had quality problems (thin paper, bad sound quality). Main examples are Brainfever, Cerebus and some others. To be fair I have to admit that later releases like Phantom, Death Dealer and others were slightly better.
Didn't Sonic Age/ CMC release the two Atlain Albums "G.O.E" and "Living In The Dark"? Before they released "Living In The Dark" Shark Records did this in their shaby (IMO) "Rusty Diamonds" series. I think the Sonic Age reissue was a big improvement compared to the Shark Recodrs release... .
M.
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:43 pm
by ION BRITTON
heavymetalmaniac wrote:There are some Sonic Age/CMC releases that are actually well done. OK, no comparison to Stormspell or SK with those 10+ booklets and if you exclude the thin paper on almost all of them, I don't think it's fair to say that all of them suck.
You're right but there was a bunch of releases which actually had quality problems (thin paper, bad sound quality). Main examples are Brainfever, Cerebus and some others.
I won't argue with this and like I've said there were some disappointments on their catalogue... I'm not extremely picky about sound quality, but I must admit that there was enough space for improvement. I don't mind a few flaws in old rereleased stuff as long as it's listenable and it doesn't sound like some shitty mp3 transfer, various stuff from other labels isnt exactly flawless in the sound quality department either, but I have no problem enjoying it