Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:38 pm
So Visitor was NOT a top want ? 

Uncompromising war on metallic modernism under the dictatorship of The Corroseum.
https://www.thecorroseum.org/forum/
I contacted a seller couple of days back regarding matrix code and year of release and he answered that when they had these pressed they tried to make them as close to the originals but CD matrix is not the same as the originals, or the 2nd pressing. He wrote that these were released in May 2011 but that this is not stated anywhere on CD or artwork.Helstar wrote:If you look on youtube official channel, it seems they have reunited and played gigs already ... they also advertise the cd being listed on ebay on the comments. So I guess he's right (probably... we should ask!)
re-animator wrote:I contacted a seller couple of days back regarding matrix code and year of release and he answered that when they had these pressed they tried to make them as close to the originals but CD matrix is not the same as the originals, or the 2nd pressing. He wrote that these were released in May 2011 but that this is not stated anywhere on CD or artwork.Helstar wrote:If you look on youtube official channel, it seems they have reunited and played gigs already ... they also advertise the cd being listed on ebay on the comments. So I guess he's right (probably... we should ask!)
He signed as: EK Wright, Visitor
Lemmy know if it's a CDR. I want to buy one too.MEXDefenderOfSteel wrote:This is NOT a boot leg. This is a remastered pressing by the band.[/b]
imma buy it soon then...
No it wasn't because in that case I would have spent $75-$100 to buy it in some of the various chances I had (30 copies on ebay+various lists). Top want is the one which is completely "lost" or hidden & noone seems to have.Helstar wrote:So Visitor was NOT a top want ?
That really has nothing to do with it. I'm not a fan of Visitor so I'm not sure about the specifics of that album for example but if it were only a single musician that has the song writing credits then that single musician would also have the rights to the music. In that case only one member would need to give his consent to have the album re-issued. It’s not about every member giving consent, it’s about who owns the rights to the music.Nebuchadnezzar wrote:And how do you know if the other members agree or are aware of that??
Year of release:2011MEXDefenderOfSteel wrote:re-animator wrote:I contacted a seller couple of days back regarding matrix code and year of release and he answered that when they had these pressed they tried to make them as close to the originals but CD matrix is not the same as the originals, or the 2nd pressing. He wrote that these were released in May 2011 but that this is not stated anywhere on CD or artwork.Helstar wrote:If you look on youtube official channel, it seems they have reunited and played gigs already ... they also advertise the cd being listed on ebay on the comments. So I guess he's right (probably... we should ask!)
He signed as: EK Wright, Visitor
This is NOT a boot leg. This is a remastered pressing by the band.
imma buy it soon then...
Waaaaaat ?Avenger wrote:I'm not a fan of Visitor
Don't like it either.Helstar wrote:Waaaaaat ?Avenger wrote:I'm not a fan of Visitor
That album is really over rated…Helstar wrote:Waaaaaat ?Avenger wrote:I'm not a fan of Visitor
Besides the artwork the "zyx metallic" writing on the disc is another thing to check here, different fonts. Bootleg's looks more "solid" while the original is notperishinflames wrote:Here is a scan of To Dust... I posted in the thread a while back, if it helps: