Page 43 of 165

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:17 pm
by Nightlock
Pheeew!

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:24 pm
by BlackStele
WTF,PARADOXX doesn't include insert...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:41 pm
by Nightlock
Doesn't it? or DO YOU HAVE AN INFERIOR COPY! :o

No I'm only kidding, is there a slight suggestion of bootleg?

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:55 pm
by SideShow
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=006

I would love to have it, but I ain't paying that for it...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:15 pm
by Korgüll
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/THE-ART-OF-SHRED ... dZViewItem
Not an insane price, just an insane idea...
Could you imagine how horrible this would be... oh gawd... :oops:
I hate that fucking font they've used too

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:42 pm
by Nightlock
Korgüll wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com.au/THE-ART-OF-SHRED ... dZViewItem
Not an insane price, just an insane idea...
Could you imagine how horrible this would be... oh gawd... :oops:
I hate that fucking font they've used too
Yeah and it would have to be made by Australians wouldn't it :P crappy cheap looking computer generated cover art.

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:04 pm
by sovdat
SideShow wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=006

I would love to have it, but I ain't paying that for it...
This is the most expensive of all three copies I've seen on ebay, however in my opinion is not THAT good, or at least there's many better albums ...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:05 pm
by sovdat
And that Paradoxx copy, what's up with the LP label sticker, it looks water-damaged ??

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:01 pm
by BlackStele
Nightlock wrote:Doesn't it? or DO YOU HAVE AN INFERIOR COPY! :o

No I'm only kidding, is there a slight suggestion of bootleg?
My copy was sealed when I received it..

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:02 pm
by Avenger
sovdat wrote:And that Paradoxx copy, what's up with the LP label sticker, it looks water-damaged ??
Well it is only graded and VG+.

Although, that does seem to be pushing it...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:06 pm
by Avenger
BlackStele wrote:
Nightlock wrote:Doesn't it? or DO YOU HAVE AN INFERIOR COPY! :o

No I'm only kidding, is there a slight suggestion of bootleg?
My copy was sealed when I received it..
Maybe re-sealed?

:(

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:14 pm
by BlackStele
Avenger wrote:
BlackStele wrote:
Nightlock wrote:Doesn't it? or DO YOU HAVE AN INFERIOR COPY! :o

No I'm only kidding, is there a slight suggestion of bootleg?
My copy was sealed when I received it..
Maybe re-sealed?

:(
no I'm pretty sure, it was obvious, that it was sealed many years ago, it was torn in some parts, (but the record and the sleeve were ok) and it was obvious its age, no there's NOT insert as far the Paradoxx is concerned, believe me._

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:24 pm
by nightsblood
Those Paradoxx pictures look weird. THey're kinda smudged/blurry around the symbols on the cover and 'insert'. Blackstele, does you copy look like that? Maybe it's just a low-resolution picture, but I dunno...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:29 pm
by BlackStele
I will scan now my copy, wait please, brb

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:42 pm
by BlackStele
ok see the vinyl:

Image

Image

P.S: nightsblood you're right, the fotos of the egay seller seem weird, I don't know what to suppose, erhmm... :o :?