Page 5 of 6
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:26 pm
by Helstar
Nah, eventually I'll trade it for a top want
But I can't see that happening

(usual "oh, yours is a 50$ cd, mine is 300$, you have to give me 6 cds in trade or nothing !")
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:34 pm
by malegys
-"Ted Heath" (sounded like Bulldozer) & then became Xyster. Great heavy powerfull thrash.
-"Slammer" were sort of bay area inspired. Never liked em though
-"Reactor" (demos only) from London were very decent agressive thrash.
Could Lord Crucifier be considered Thrash? Saw them live a few times (they were awful),but their demos & LP isn't bad.
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:15 pm
by Yakish
Helstar wrote:Nah, eventually I'll trade it for a top want

Mr.Helstar, may i see your want list or list of CDs that you would glad to trade 1 on 1 for Arbitrater?
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:22 pm
by akira
I don't know if it's mentioned but Amnesia is an awesome band.I like album very much.
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:45 am
by Outcast
BOLT THROWER - In Battle There Is No Law!
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:58 am
by Avenger
Outcast wrote:BOLT THROWER - In Battle There Is No Law!
That ain't Thrash. It's Death Metal.
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:44 am
by MetalizeR
Avenger wrote:Outcast wrote:BOLT THROWER - In Battle There Is No Law!
That ain't Thrash. It's Death Metal.
More in the Crustgrind side of course.
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:59 am
by Outcast
It's as "death metal" as first two KREATOR albums for example.
They became known as death metal with their next releases, this one wasn't so death metal yet.
It can be considered as "crust" as their roots were in hardcore scene and their lyrics kind of inspired by anarchism, but theres no grind in there (no blast beats, songs way too long and structured etc.)
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:04 am
by Avenger
Outcast wrote:It's as "death metal" as first two KREATOR albums for example.
They became known as death metal with their next releases, this one wasn't so death metal yet.
It can be considered as "crust" as their roots were in hardcore scene and their lyrics kind of inspired by anarchism, but theres no grind in there (no blast beats, songs way too long and structured etc.)
And the vocal style?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:38 am
by Outcast
Sounds like usual hardcore vocal of that time. Not really a death growl yet.
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:03 pm
by Avenger
Outcast wrote:Sounds like usual hardcore vocal of that time. Not really a death growl yet.
Not all Death Metal is growly. Especially the ealier stuff.
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:15 pm
by Outcast
Yeah, but then again, would you call SACRILEGE - Behind The Realms Of Madness LP a death metal? That BT debut was under the heavy influence of that record.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:02 am
by msp
Outcast wrote:It's as "death metal" as first two KREATOR albums for example.
They became known as death metal with their next releases, this one wasn't so death metal yet.
It can be considered as "crust" as their roots were in hardcore scene and their lyrics kind of inspired by anarchism, but theres no grind in there (no blast beats, songs way too long and structured etc.)
Correct
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:54 pm
by Avenger
msp wrote:Outcast wrote:It can be considered as "crust" as their roots were in hardcore scene and their lyrics kind of inspired by anarchism, but theres no grind in there (no blast beats, songs way too long and structured etc.)
Correct
So we've agreed this isn't Thrash.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 6:10 pm
by msp
Avenger wrote:msp wrote:Outcast wrote:It can be considered as "crust" as their roots were in hardcore scene and their lyrics kind of inspired by anarchism, but theres no grind in there (no blast beats, songs way too long and structured etc.)
Correct
So we've agreed this isn't Thrash.
Yes, in no way were Bolt Thrower a thrash band