LethylSteel wrote:
Ahh come on, 100 $ for a record is still an affordable price (if the music is worth that of course) and ok imo because it's still in the limit. If your monthly budget allows you to buy a 500 $ record then your just rich.
So $100 for a record is fine, but $500 is not fine. Is $150 OK? $200? $215.75? Where exactly, to the penny, is the line?
That's so. And why would you have a 500 $ record when you can download the songs for free? Just to say you have that record, nothing more. The excuse "I care for the music" is invalid here. It's just that you can say "I have that record."
Why pay $100 for a record when you can just d/l the songs for free? Just to say you have the record, nothing more.
If you'd care for the music you could buy a shitload of records (and better records) for these 500 $.
If you only care about the music you could buy a shitload of records for $100 instead of just buying one $100 record. And 'better' is completely subjective; everyone has different tastes.
A record that was pressed in a 500 or 1000 copies edition is just not worth 500 $.
It's not just dependent on pressing size.
How many copies survive?
How many people are clamoring for a copy?
Has the record ever been found in quantity, like a band member sold a box of 100 copies?
What is the probability of a large quantity turning up? Foe example, have the band members already been found and sold all their copies, if they had any?
That price was just procreated by greedy collectors who want that record in their collections (that basically only include the mega raries because they just don't care for the other Metal bands) and don't care for the money because they do not NEED to care for the money coz they are rich.
Metal collectors are a notoriously poor bunch overall. There are only a small handful of metal collectors who will pay high prices (> $200) for a large number of different records.
Collectibles of any kind are only worth what someone is willing to pay. If 30 people out there are willing to pay $700 for a real Solar Eagle, then the next 29 copies are gonna sell for $700. If only 2 people are willing to bid that much, then the price is gonna drop when copy #2 hits the auction block.
And that you don't always have to pay the highest price ever to possess a special record depends just on how patient you are.
True, and all of us- rich, poor, and in-between- love to get a rare record for a bargain price. But the truth of the matter is that you are only going to get so many bargains during your lifetime, and they're often going to be for random items, not necessarily for items that you really want. For example, I got a grerat buy on a copy of 'From the Fjords' once, but I do not like that album, so while it was a nice buy it didn't go into my collection. I would much rather get a bargain on a Pentagram 7", but that's never happened. And it may never happen. So, do I sit and wait for 10 years, hoping the Pentagram 7" turns up at a yard sale for $5? What happens if it doesn't show up, do i wait another 10 years? Or do I save up some money and pay a couple of hundred for it so i can enjoy it for the next 10 years?
Patience in a collector is definitely a good trait, but it does have drawbacks. If you insist on being patient and never paying very much for rare collectibles, you face the following limits:
1- your collection will never get very big b/c you'll only find so many bargains. If you're happy with a small collection, no prob.
2- many items you want will never turn up for a bargain price so you'll have to do without them. You'll have to be content with reissues and mp3s.
3- to get the bargains you will have to invest a lot of time and effort into constantly searching for them. This may not be feasible depending on how much time you must dedicate to your job, family, and other matters.
Finally, you can overdo it regarding patience. Perfect example played out THursday night on ebay. There was a very rare Blues record for sale that my dad, who collects blues records, has wanted for decades (literally). He's seen only one other copy for sale several years ago, which he didn't buy and he's been mad at himself ever since for letting it slip away. It was priced very affordably back then, but he wanted it for a bargain, rather than pay a fair price for it, so he let it go and he's been kicking himself ever since.
So here's another copy, in very nice condition, that he has a chance to buy; he spotted the auction as soon as it was listed and got all excited over it. My dad is in his late 60s; he's not gonna be around forever, so his chances of getting the remaining items on his want list are getting slimmer. He's doing alright financially- he's not rich, but he has no debts and he has enough of a retirement plan that he can live quite comfortably. So as the auction winds down, he bids on the record, and his bid ties him for the lead, but of course on ebay when there is a tie the person who bid first stays in the lead. No biggie, all my dad has to do is enter a bid $5 higher and he'll have the lead. Instead of entering another bid, he gets pissed off that the price is now high enough that it's not going to be a bargain. So he refuses to bid again. The auction closes, and no one else bids either. Dad loses the record. $5 extra would have got him a record he's been wanting for decades. $5 extra would have atoned for letting that other copy slip through his fingers years ago. But he decided to be patient in hopes that another copy will show up some day that he can get for a cheaper price. Perhaps you would applaud him for his patience, for his refusal to spend more than that arbitrary amount, and for holding out for a 50 cent copy at a garage sale some day. From my POV, I saw a guy perpetuate a decades-long search for something he would love to have over 5 measly dollars that he could easily afford when there's a very real possibility he'll die without ever having another chance to get a copy.
Moral of the story- Even patience should have limits.