Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:51 pm
1.60-1.75 for male?
The Corroseum forum (new design under construction)
Uncompromising war on metallic modernism under the dictatorship of The Corroseum.
https://www.thecorroseum.org/forum/
Old KIT thread
Page 24 of 65
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:33 pm
Ahh metal daze, 2009 is minus one handsome bloke... me! I don't remember last years planned meet up but the photos confirm it happened.
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:38 pm
haha i totally fit the description!The Knell wrote:1.60-1.75 for male?
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:45 pm
Ha ha, Mr "Fils du Metal"s expression = priceless!Nicko McBuff wrote:I don't remember last years planned meet up but the photos confirm it happened.
Crap news, man. No HOA either then?Ahh metal daze, 2009 is minus one handsome bloke... me!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:32 am
Most likely not, I'm in debt from the last trip and I have 4 months to save. But hell if I make it up I'll go hahah.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:21 pm
These measurements make no sense to me.The Knell wrote:1.60-1.75 for male?
Even though Canada uses the Metric System, measurements such as pounds, feet and inches are still the most commonly used today.
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:31 pm
1.60 means 1 metre, 60 centimetres.Avenger wrote:These measurements make no sense to me.The Knell wrote:1.60-1.75 for male?
Even though Canada uses the Metric System, measurements such as pounds, feet and inches are still the most commonly used today.
Interesting topic by the way. Actually, Wikipedia states: "According to the US CIA World Factbook in 2006, the International System of Units is the primary or sole system of measurement for all nations except for Myanmar, Liberia and the United States."
Even though inhabitants of certain nations like the UK and USA (and Canada, apparently) continue to use non-SI units I'd wager that it's pretty safe to say that most people around the world use the metric system or a derivative thereof (take for example China, where the traditional weight "jin" was redefined to 0.5 kg).
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:36 pm
i have always thought metric system is way easier...dont know why the US has to go against the world always 
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:08 pm
Who keeps the metric system down? We do! We doooo!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:10 pm
awsome!!!
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:10 pm
Well, I'd say by normal standards, "short" for a male is anything under 5'8.
I'm 5'11 by the way.
I'm 5'11 by the way.
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:48 pm
Bah, "short" is everything under 6'2" for males 
I'm 196cm tall btw
I'm 196cm tall btw
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:47 am
norwegian genetics period ha!great_knuthulhu wrote:Bah, "short" is everything under 6'2" for males
I'm 196cm tall btw
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:37 am
The "scale" human male when used in a comparison is always 6'0 though.great_knuthulhu wrote:Bah, "short" is everything under 6'2" for males
So, I'd say that's average.
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:34 am
Maybe Militia is also playing in Frankfurt the sunday after KIT. Perfect!