Avenger said:
"Non-fact – This person has made more then 10 pressings."
No, I can't prove his pressing size is > 10. And you can't prove his pressing size IS 10 or that he will not press more in the future. Since neither of us can be proven correct, let's agree to disagree:
--I'll continue to be suspicious of the guy who we know for a FACT is doing something dishonest (printing boots).
--You continue to mock him for being a dishonest bootlegger while you simultaneously claim that we should not question his advertised pressing size until we see more than 10 copies offered for sale.
I and the other people hereabouts will continue to laugh at your blatant stupidity.
Avenger said:
"you base your opinions on assumptions which makes you PRETENTIOUS".
From dictionary.com
pre·ten·tious [pri-ten-shuhs] adjective
Characterized by assumption
of dignity or importance.
Making an exaggerated outward show; ostentatious.
Oh, so sorry, looks like the big word tripped you up yet again. Given that you read on a fourth grade level, i guess it's understandable. See, not all assumptions or opinions immediately make one pretentious. I have a long history of qualifying my opinions as "just my opinion" because I don't like it when people act as though their opinion is superior to everyone else's. Like when you say things such as, "I think people who pay more than peanuts for bootlegs are complete idiots". That's your opinion, based on an assumption, and you're trying to sound like your view is more important than anyone else's.
So one more time, WHO's acting pretentious here?
Moving on...
So now the surliest little troll on this site wants to "communicate in a civil manner" and get his nose up in the air because I flamed him?
I've been on this site for ~ 5 years and I don't think I have ever blown up at someone before. Then again, I've never had a dumbass with the mental capacity of a sea urchin keep replying to my posts with comments that never make a god-damned lick of sense. Nothing infuriates me like a brainless child who can't understand what the grown-ups are talking about yet insists on interrupting with the same comment over and over and over.
Yes Avenger, we know you don't like bootlegs. Now run along and play you little scamp and quit bothering the adults, we heard you in the first 397 threads about bootlegs.
Avenger wrote:[I just cannot wrap my head around why you are trying to tell me that some bootlegs are good and some are bad.
The reason you cannot wrap your head around that concept is because I have never made that claim. That is why we're all laughing at you so hard. You're attacking a comment that no one here ever made.
Given that you read on a fourth grade level, i guess it's understandable.
Little troll, you find one post, any post, where I said that "some bootlegs are (morally) good and some are (morally) bad". Or where I say "old boots are good, new boots are bad". You can't. Because I've never said that. You're just too dumb to realize it. You're so hung up on boots that you can't even read straight.
Given that you read on a fourth grade level, i guess it's understandable.
All I've said from the beginning is that some older boots are definitely rare, so I can see why folks who do want them will pay more for them.
But I do not want them.
I hardly ever buy a boot.
And when I do I won't pay much at all for it.
And I couldn't care less when it was made.
Overall I am not interested in boots.
Supposedly you read my posts where I have made these points repeatedly, yet you continue to spout off things like "you act all pretentious about new boots because you only respect old boots" and "how can you claim some boots are good and other boots are bad"?
Given that you read on a fourth grade level, i guess it's understandable.
But I have no tolerance for someone with such limited mental facilities that they cannot understand a point that is repeatedly made very clearly, and instead goes off on some accusatory tangent. You're like those people who hear someone ask, "Why did the US attack Iraq since Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11?" and then you reply, "if you don't support our troops you must be a terrorist supporter! USA USA! USA!".
And yes, I live in the South, which is not renowned for it's good grammar. However, I'm not you're average redneck southerner. I honestly wondered if you were from Quebec and have trouble with English. Given your response, I guess English really is your first language. So i apologize for implying that you had a difficulty with the language barrier. I guess instead you really are just a moron with the reading skills of a house plant.
When you learn to read words and use them in a coherent manner, let me know and I'll talk to you like an adult. Until then, I'll ignore you, and maybe occasionally mock your ignorance. I have better things to do than continually berate an obnoxious, illiterate child. But I do have a couple of more minutes right now, so about that mocking your ignorance thing....
Avenger in school:
Teacher- "Class, who can solve this math problem, 2 + 2?"
Avenger- "I know! I know!"
Teacher- "What's the answer little boy?"
Avenger- "Thomas Jefferson!"
Teacher- "Uh,.... this is math class junior, history is this afternoon"
Avenger- "How can you say that Thomas Jefferson couldn't do math?"
Teacher "I didn't say that"
Avenger- "Thomas Jefferson could do math! You can't prove to me that he didn't know how to do math!"
Teacher "Son, why do you keep talking about Thomas Jefferson during math class?"
Avenger "It is a fact that you cannot prove that Thomas Jefferson did not know how to do math. You need to get your facts straight. Anyone who claims Thomas Jefferson couldn't do math is a complete idiot".
Maybe the reason you read on a fourth-grade level is that you never made it to fifth grade.[/quote]