Well that can be debated to length but my short answer is : maybe.daniel wrote:But really, you think there is some deep meaning to all the metal you like? Meaning not only of your own making?
Yes. I never claimed otherwise. Please try, when discussing with people you don't know well, to not reach towards the worst interpretation of what they might be saying. My opinion is a moderate one and I don't think I should have to defend or distance myself from extremes I never endorsed, just because you've ran into them in the past and have had this tired discussion a lot.but it is about taste, not some universal truth.
See here is a useful improvement on this 'end of discussion' point of view: why don't I like them? That is the question you should be asking, that is, if you're interested in a dialogue. Of course its a matter of opinion, but my argumentation might or might not be illuminating for you if you'd ask to hear it instead of assuming and blanketing. 'You just don't like it, end of story'. What does this even mean? Surely there are reasons for my dislike. They have to do with my understanding of vision and capability and honesty and passion and if that sort of stuff bores you to hear - perhaps understandably - then you shouldn't engage in a dialogue with me. But if you do, please give me the benefit of not playing the part of your strawman.What it boils down to is you don't agree with them, after which you critisize them for lack of vision and song-writing skills, which I can't take seriously, it doesn't so much matter whether you like them or not but coming up with rather silly accusations like that is unnecessary.
So, their fault is not their opinions, it is in having the skills (on all levels, songwriting, presentation, aesthetics) to make me care for their point of view as a human being. I am not very close politically to let's say the political beliefs of mister Vikerness but he happened to have the ability to make me care for what Burzum were about. Arghoslent do not. They might play exuberant heavy metal riffs left and right but the core of the band appears very tired to me, very jaded, very cynical (as seen in the interview also). As if going through the motions. I guess a decade of despondency trapped in a racist skinhead black metal scene will do that to you! There is no innocence in Argoslent and no humanity, and these things are important to me when I listen to HM. I'd say that there just is no Heavy Metal without an innocent core. So, as jaded and damaged 30 year old dudes that make rote metal, I appear unable to give a shit about their hate-fuelled music regardless of how many nice riffs are stapled on top. This is the bottom line I've been working towards: there's many things that can fuel a great HM band, usually a combination of superficially disparate feelings do best (like romanticism coupled with nihilism or humanism with atavism) but I don't see that sort of range in the feeling Arghoslent go for. Their lyrics are well made and often attempt to touch on the heroic aspect of war but the complete package doesn't engage like that. It just appears base, yet calculated.
It is not in my opinion an accident that the baseness of emotion is at the core of most 'nazi'esque bands I've listened to over the years. It takes emotionally stunted people generally to hold these racialist views or enjoy constant exposure to them. That Arghoslent are pretty much the best this scene has to offer is telling. I am not so desperate to consume riffs that I'll take theirs part and parcel with what comes with them.
Perhaps now we understand each other better.