Shot at 2012-08-09
what do you guys think about this?
according to this
http://www.discogs.com/Purtenance-Membe ... se/3357403
it is legit, but I thought it was supposed to be dc-011 NOT dc-001??
Search found 3 matches
- Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:07 pm
- Forum: CD collector heaven!
- Topic: Non-urgent CD Inquiries (2012) READ THE FIRST POST
- Replies: 358
- Views: 146928
purtenance
Shot at 2012-08-09
what do you guys think about this?
according to this
http://www.discogs.com/Purtenance-Membe ... se/3357403
it is legit, but I thought it was supposed to be dc-011 NOT dc-001??
- Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Forum: CD collector heaven!
- Topic: Bootleg Warning Thread - CD (2012)
- Replies: 405
- Views: 130286
You sound like the guy selling that copy for $160. :D I wish, then I could have made around $50 profit. I'm not saying I'm 100% sure this copy is legit, but if this indeed is a professional bootleg, why wouldn't they just add the MPO 01 @ at the end of the matrix like the black one? If they are abl...
- Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:05 am
- Forum: CD collector heaven!
- Topic: Bootleg Warning Thread - CD (2012)
- Replies: 405
- Views: 130286
So, is it your auction? I can make it crystal clear! Matrix of original is: THR 015 MPO 01 @ for both, black and red versions. Yours is bootleg, yes, very high quality made, but unofficial press I don't believe so. I have this and did lots of research on it before bidding. There are people who boug...